(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3540) [ukfortran] N1718: co_lbound and co_ubound
Malcolm Cohen
malcolm
Mon Mar 3 00:57:02 EST 2008
On Sat, 01 Mar 2008 04:59:51 +0900, John Reid <j.k.reid at rl.ac.uk> wrote:
> N1718 is without co_lbound and co_ubound. I think this is a mistake.
I agree.
In retrospect it is a pity that 08-131 didn't have a reminder NOT to
delete those (they are mixed in with the collectives), as it was a
pretty easy mistake to make...
...but the mistake and the responsibility are certainly mine alone.
My apologies.
But does this mean we need a new document before proceeding to CD?
The missing routines are certainly convenient (and should be reinstated
in the next revision whenever that is) but they are I think not
essential to coarray programming (unlike THIS_IMAGE et al), so
it doesn't appear to be a fatal flaw.
(Producing a new document is neither cost-free nor risk-free...)
Opinions?
Cheers,
--
................Malcolm Cohen (malcolm at nag-j.co.jp)
More information about the J3
mailing list