(j3.2006) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #17 - due 25-Jul-2008
Van Snyder
van.snyder
Sun Jun 22 20:02:39 EDT 2008
The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
Yes No Number Title
-C- --- F95/0074 TARGET dummy arguments and POINTER expressions
The answer should include a remark that the
outcome of this interpretation is reversed in
Fortran 2008 as a new feature.
-Y- --- F95/0102 mask-expr evaluated only once
-Y- --- F03/0049 Separators in list-directed output involving
UDDTIO
-Y- --- F03/0071 Subroutine/function ambiguity in generics
-Y- --- F03/0073 C interop of dummy procedures
-Y- --- F03/0074 Type mismatch for C character arguments
-Y- --- F03/0075 C interop of derived types with array components
-C- --- F03/0076 Scope of Fortran names of procedures with binding
labels
The answer should include a remark that the
outcome of this interpretation is reversed in
Fortran 2008 as a new feature.
-Y- --- F03/0077 LBOUND of array structure component
-Y- --- F03/0081 F edit descriptor with field width 0
-C- --- F03/0082 VALUE in place of INTENT for pure procedure dummy
arguments
The answer should include a remark that the
outcome of this interpretation is reversed in
Fortran 2008 as a new feature.
-Y- --- F03/0087 Entry names as dummy procedure arguments
-Y- --- F03/0098 Does allocate with source= define subcomponents?
-N- --- F03/0112 attributes allowed for dummy arguments in defined
assignments
In the discussion of the second question, replace
"There are no" by "No" or insert "to" or "that"
before "disallow".
The edit contradicts the answer: "Yes to both
questions...." Either we don't need any edits,
or the answer needs to include "... but we didn't
intend...."
-Y- --- F03/0117 STOP executed via function in input/output list
--
Van
More information about the J3
mailing list