(j3.2006) Public Comment J32002

Whitlock, Stan stan.whitlock
Wed Jun 18 09:44:48 EDT 2008

I have questions about our F08 public comment process:
  -  Why is the comment number J3200n?  I was expecting "F2008 public
comment 0001" etc.  What is the "2" there for?

  -  J32001 is 08-209 from DeLisle.  J32002 is 08-210 that Michael
couldn't post to the J3 web site.  Why are comments in .pdf files?  I
expected pure text.

  - J32002 came to me as a uuencoded embedded file.  This is not the way
J3 does mail attachments.  The spreadsheet came through with J32003 as
unreadable uuencoded too.  Please don't tell me the freeware tool I
should use to decode this mess - attachments should be attached files
that standard stuff like MS Outlook can handle.

  - J32003 is 08-211.  I was surprised to see Van start a dialog with
Tobias about his comment.  I thought proposed answers to comments would
be drafted and debated by J3 as a whole.

  - In the conversation that Van is having with Tobias {who responded},
there is no mention of the public comment number, like in the subject.
We need some convention so we can keep track of the debates.


More information about the J3 mailing list