(j3.2006) BESSEL_JN in draft of Fortran 2008

Dan Nagle dannagle
Wed Jun 18 05:35:54 EDT 2008


On Jun 18, 2008, at 2:58 AM, Tobias Burnus wrote:

> Van Snyder wrote:
>> The reason for the transformational function is that Bessel functions
>> are evaluated by recurrence, and in particular by a Miller algorith.
>> When Bessel_JN is needed for n1, n1+1, ..., n2, it is far more  
>> efficient
> This still does not explain why the elemental function and the
> transformational function should to have the same name.

Generic resolution works, no?


Dan Nagle

More information about the J3 mailing list