(j3.2006) derived types with type parameters are different
Tue Jul 29 17:16:29 EDT 2008
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 13:46, Michael Ingrassia wrote:
> If it causes significant loss of functionality, what exactly is the
> functionality that we lose?
I (and probably Lawrie andothers) agree, but there is the issue of backward
compatibility and simply not making "language design" changes
retroactively---only fixes of techical messups.
More information about the J3