(j3.2006) derived types with type parameters are different
Mon Jul 28 20:03:46 EDT 2008
On Monday 28 July 2008 10:41, Bill Long wrote:
> In this case, I
> assumed Bob wanted to see if the compilers would catch the errors.
Well, Aleks wants to see what the standard actually says. Bob raised a
question, and I have not seen a clear answer for the non-KIND case, only "we
don't want to change what we've implemented". Well, no one has asked for a
change to the implementation, but a clarification along the lines of "what is
the intention in the standard", if any?
> This one compiled and output:
> CALLED S1
> CALLED S2
When you change the parameters to be LENgth instead of KIND (throughout the
example), does it compile, and what does it give? I honestly have no access
to the Cray compiler (that I know of :-), so it is a question, not a proposal
to change anything.
More information about the J3