(j3.2006) derived types with type parameters are different
Fri Jul 25 13:35:03 EDT 2008
On Friday 25 July 2008 09:44, Bill Long wrote:
> ?The feature is a pain to implement, so resistance to
> doing it over a different way will be very high.
But what way does Cray do---you seemed unsure of the actual answer? Can Robert
please prepare two examples (one KIND, one non-KIND), including the mentioned
generic interface, and see if Cray and IBM actually do the same thing?
More information about the J3