(j3.2006) Public Comment J32034
Jim Giles
JamesGiles-2
Tue Jul 15 21:39:46 EDT 2008
Well, I've spent more time than I intended here and I suspect
there's no point anyway. I've not seen substantial changes *after*
a public review since f8x. I don't expect any now. However I will
add:
Van Snyder wrote:
...
> [...] I see no reason not to allow it.
This is one of hte most destructive phrases in all of language design.
Especially in a language that already very complex and arcane, an
adequate reason no to allow something is lack of a *very* well
documented need for the feature. Practically universal acclaim
should be needed.
J. Giles
More information about the J3
mailing list