(j3.2006) Public Comment J32034

[Aleksandar Donev]

On Tuesday 15 July 2008 15:02, Jim Giles wrote:
> Actually, for reasons given later, ?the idiom is more likely to be:
> ? ?CRITICAL
> ? ? ? BLOCK
> ? ? ? ? ?declare local entities
> ? ? ? ? ?...
> ? ? ? END BLOCK
> ? ?END CRITICAL
How about we add a [ specification-part ] to CRITICAL (or all the block 
constructs for that matter)? This avoid your making CRITICAL an attribute, 
which I still don't see nor agree with. It is a block construct ("8.1 
Executable constructs containing blocks") and I don't see what is wrong with 
that.
Aleks