(j3.2006) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #15 - due 10-Feb-2008

[Bill Long]

Ballot from Bill Long representing Cray Inc.

Yes   No    Number     Title

-C-   ---   F03/0003   Referencing deferred bindings
-C-   ---   F03/0004   Type-bound procedures and undefined association
                        status
-Y-   ---   F03/0079   Value of decimal exponent for a real zero value
-Y-   ---   F03/0080   Formatted output of a negative real zero value
-Y-   ---   F03/0099   Clause 16 does not account for volatile variable
-C-   ---   F03/0100   Error in field width for special cases of signed
                        INFINITY output
-Y-   ---   F03/0102   Evaluation of bound-expr in data pointer
                        assignment
-Y-   ---   F03/0103   Restrictions on dummy arguments not present for
                        polymorphic type or parameterized derived type
-C-   ---   F03/0104   Deallocation and finalization of bounds-remapped
                        pointers
-Y-   ---   F03/0105   SIZE= specifier and UDDTIO
---   -N-   F03/0106   Inquire by unit inconsistencies
-Y-   ---   F03/0107   Are the IEEE_* elemental routines required
-Y-   ---   F03/0108   Is IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN consistent with the other
                        IEEE_SUPPORT functions
-Y-   ---   F03/0109   Referencing deferred binding via absent dummy
                        argument

 

Comment for F03/0003:

  As noted by others, a ",nopass" needs to be added to the procedure
  statement in the definition of type t2.

Comment for F03/0004:

  Wording improvement in the Discussion section: replace "requires
  there to be an object" with "requires an object".

Comment for F03/0100:

  It appears that part of the HISTORY section is missing. It seem like
  we're on the second round with this one.

Comment for F03/0104:

  In ANSWER: (b), first line, add "are" between "finalizations" and
  "processed".

Comments for NO vote on F03/0106:

  The edit for 9.9.1.16 NEXTREC=... is unnecessary and redundant. If
  there is no connection, then certainly the file is not connected for
  direct access, so that case is covered by [213:15].

  The edit for 9.9.1.21 POS=... is unnecessary and redundant. If there
  is no connection, then certainly the file is not connected for
  stream access, so that case is covered by [214:19].

-- 
Bill Long                                   longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support    &              voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development         fax:   651-605-9142
Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120