(j3.2006) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #15 - due 10-Feb-2008
Whitlock, Stan
stan.whitlock
Tue Jan 15 23:10:01 EST 2008
The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:
Yes No Number Title
-C- --- F03/0003 Referencing deferred bindings
-Y- --- F03/0004 Type-bound procedures and undefined association
status
-Y- --- F03/0079 Value of decimal exponent for a real zero value
-Y- --- F03/0080 Formatted output of a negative real zero value
-Y- --- F03/0099 Clause 16 does not account for volatile variable
-Y- --- F03/0100 Error in field width for special cases of signed
INFINITY output
-Y- --- F03/0102 Evaluation of bound-expr in data pointer
assignment
-Y- --- F03/0103 Restrictions on dummy arguments not present for
polymorphic type or parameterized derived
type
-Y- --- F03/0104 Deallocation and finalization of bounds-remapped
pointers
-Y- --- F03/0105 SIZE= specifier and UDDTIO
-N- --- F03/0106 Inquire by unit inconsistencies
-Y- --- F03/0107 Are the IEEE_* elemental routines required
-Y- --- F03/0108 Is IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN consistent with the other
IEEE_SUPPORT functions
-Y- --- F03/0109 Referencing deferred binding via absent dummy
argument
F03/0003: I agree with Jim Xia:
The example given in the interp has another error unrelated to the
issue
raised: the type-bound procedure, deferred_proc, for type t2
must have NOPASS attribute. The example should be corrected.
F03/0106: I agree with Jim Xia:
The edit for NEXTREC= (9.9.1.16) says "At [213:16], after
'connection' ...".
But I cannot find the word "connection" on that line, so I'm not
quite
certain what the edit is trying to say. Does it mean the word
"connected"
at [213:15]?
The directions for the edit should read "At [213:16], after 'connected'
...".
/Stan Whitlock
Intel Corporation
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20080115/ca872808/attachment.html
More information about the J3
mailing list