(j3.2006) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #15 - due 10-Feb-2008

Whitlock, Stan stan.whitlock
Tue Jan 15 23:10:01 EST 2008


The following Fortran interpretations are being balloted:

 

Yes   No    Number     Title

 

-C-   ---   F03/0003   Referencing deferred bindings 
-Y-   ---   F03/0004   Type-bound procedures and undefined association 
                               status 
-Y-   ---   F03/0079   Value of decimal exponent for a real zero value 
-Y-   ---   F03/0080   Formatted output of a negative real zero value 
-Y-   ---   F03/0099   Clause 16 does not account for volatile variable 
-Y-   ---   F03/0100   Error in field width for special cases of signed 
                               INFINITY output 
-Y-   ---   F03/0102   Evaluation of bound-expr in data pointer 
                               assignment 
-Y-   ---   F03/0103   Restrictions on dummy arguments not present for 
                               polymorphic type or parameterized derived
type 
-Y-   ---   F03/0104   Deallocation and finalization of bounds-remapped 
                               pointers 
-Y-   ---   F03/0105   SIZE= specifier and UDDTIO 
-N-   ---   F03/0106   Inquire by unit inconsistencies 
-Y-   ---   F03/0107   Are the IEEE_* elemental routines required 
-Y-   ---   F03/0108   Is IEEE_SUPPORT_NAN consistent with the other 
                               IEEE_SUPPORT functions 
-Y-   ---   F03/0109   Referencing deferred binding via absent dummy 
                               argument

 

 

F03/0003:  I agree with Jim Xia:

 

   The example given in the interp has another error unrelated to the
issue 
   raised: the type-bound procedure, deferred_proc, for type t2 
   must have NOPASS attribute.  The example should be corrected.



 

F03/0106:  I agree with Jim Xia:


       The edit for NEXTREC= (9.9.1.16) says "At [213:16], after
'connection' ...". 
       But I cannot find the word "connection" on that line, so I'm not
quite 
       certain what the edit is trying to say.  Does it mean the word
"connected" 
       at [213:15]?

 

The directions for the edit should read "At [213:16], after 'connected'
...". 

 

/Stan Whitlock

 Intel Corporation

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/attachments/20080115/ca872808/attachment.html 



More information about the J3 mailing list