(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3532) Letter ballot on Fortran 2003 interpretations
Van Snyder
Van.Snyder
Wed Feb 27 22:51:31 EST 2008
Jim is correct. This wouldn't affect the corrigendum, but we might as
well get it right.
Van
======================================================================
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 21:53 -0500, Jim Xia wrote:
>
>
> The following Fortran 2003 interpretations are being balloted:
>
> Yes No Number Title
> -Y- --- F03/0049 Separators in list-directed output
> involving UDDTIO
> -Y- --- F03/0050 Questions about internal files
> -Y- --- F03/0086 Elemental and BIND(C)
> -Y- --- F03/0088 Defined operations/assignments and
> VOLATILE/ASYNCHRONOUS
> -Y- --- F03/0089 Interoperability of non-BIND derived types
> -C- --- F03/0092 Procedure characteristics and unlimited
> polymorphic
> -Y- --- F03/0093 Allocatable array on intrinsic assignment with
> scalar expr
> -Y- --- F03/0094 Final subroutine and VALUE attribute
> -Y- --- F03/0095 Bounds remapped pointer assignment and
> ASSOCIATED
> -Y- --- F03/0097 Blanks as separators in NAMELIST input
> -Y- --- F03/0098 Does allocate with source= define subcomponents?
> -Y- --- F03/0101 Is UDDTIO output suitable for namelist and
> list-directed input
>
>
> Comments on F03/0092
>
> In the example code, it uses the following declaration
> procedure (foo), target :: proc_tgt
>
> Don't we just violate the syntax rules for <proc-attr-spec> in
> procedure
> declaration statement [264:9-20]? TARGET is not listed as one of the
> <proc-attr-spec> [264:13-18]. This statement should be changed to
> procedure (foo) :: proc_tgt
> as appeared in the original interp paper.
>
>
>
> Jim Xia
>
> XL Fortran Compiler Testing
> IBM Toronto Lab at 8200 Warden Ave.
> Phone (905) 413-3444 Tie-line 313-3444
> D2/NAH/8200 /MKM
> _______________________________________________
> J3 mailing list
> J3 at j3-fortran.org
> http://j3-fortran.org/mailman/listinfo/j3
More information about the J3
mailing list