(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3778) Ballot on the technical content of the TR
Tue Dec 9 00:22:12 EST 2008
Van Snyder wrote:
> Robert Corbett wrote:
>>I am not pleased that the proposal is making other vendors'
>>extensionsto the data structures, beyond what is needed for Fortran,
>>part of theFortran language.
> Keep in mind that the Further Interoperability with C TR affects only
> interfaces with BIND(C). Vendors can handle them differently from
> interfaces without BIND(C) if they choose to do so.
I understand that. I also understand the advantage the proposal will
give to vendors who already use the knew capabilities. I don't like
Sun being put at a disadvantage relative to those vendors.
More information about the J3