(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3748) [POSSIBLE SPAM] May WG5/J3 meeting]]
Fri Dec 5 09:18:32 EST 2008
Bill Long wrote:
> If it matters, the old dates are in the J3 meeting 185 minutes (which
> are approved and publicly available) and are in the draft 186 minutes I
> sent to Stan. If we change the dates, then at least Stan should
> "repair" the 186 minutes.
OK. See also the minutes of the Feb. WG5 meeting (N1715, 9.1, para 5) where WG5
expressed a preference for Monday 0800 to Friday 1200 with no excursion.
>> In view of the way we worked to the dot of 12 noon on Friday in Tokyo,
>> should we
>> do the same in Las Vegas?
> Not a problem for me. But, people need to know far enough in advance to
> schedule flights accordingly.
This is my current plan. That is, I think we need 4.5 days rather than 4 days.
Please say if this would give you a serious difficulty.
More information about the J3