(j3.2006) Comment on N1761
Mon Dec 1 17:45:57 EST 2008
On Monday 01 December 2008 14:40, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> > * Give up having a generic interface, or use the assumed size only
> > for 1-d arrays. This would only require correcting the above example.
To be clear: I am voting for making it a non-generic interface.
> I believe that for DIMENSION(:) this rule
> (p290, para 13) does not and should not apply.
Fat fingers: DIMENSION(..) or whatever we made the syntax of assumed-rank
More information about the J3