(j3.2006) Why we should have kept macros

[Aleksandar Donev]

On Wednesday 20 August 2008 14:51, Van Snyder wrote:
> Instead, I'm inclined to ignore kind type parameters and provide two
> base types, one with default real components, and one with double
> precision real components. 
That's what I do.
> Instead of macros or generic modules, I'll 
> end up making imaginative use of INCLUDE.
Or just use an external macro processor (I use FWEB).
Aleks