(j3.2006) request for interpretation

Aleksandar Donev donev1
Wed Apr 2 17:06:59 EDT 2008

On Wednesday 02 April 2008 12:33, Bill Long wrote:
> rules that require distinguishable specifics have been converted into
> Constraints. ?Thus, while some lax compliers can argue conformance now,
> the new standard will require that they diagnose the error in the
> example code you posted.
Bill, did you read Kurt's post? The essential point he made is that those 
rules specifically do not apply to specifics that come in through a generic 
identifier via host association. What are you citing as a counter-argument?

More information about the J3 mailing list