(j3.2006) POSIX
Bill Long
longb
Thu Mar 29 18:46:09 EDT 2007
In the process, are they planning to bring the standards forward 30
years to modern times? It seems pointless to just rearrange the pages.
What is the argument for doing this? As a practical matter, with the
advent of C interop and the ability to call libc routines directly, it
has been a long time since I bothered with a PXF... man page.
Cheers,
Bill
Michael Ingrassia wrote:
>>There will shortly run a CT22 ballot regarding whether
>>the POSIX standards should be combined into one standard,
>>
>>
>
>I don't see a benefit to combining the various POSIX standards into one
>standard, and there is a cost to obtaining new standards and documenting
>them.
>
> --Michael I.
>_______________________________________________
>J3 mailing list
>J3 at j3.scs.gmu.edu
>http://j3.scs.gmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/j3
>
>
--
Bill Long longb at cray.com
Fortran Technical Support & voice: 651-605-9024
Bioinformatics Software Development fax: 651-605-9142
Cray Inc., 1340 Mendota Heights Rd., Mendota Heights, MN, 55120
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://j3.scs.gmu.edu/pipermail/j3/attachments/20070329/9cac0b6e/attachment.html
More information about the J3
mailing list