(j3.2006) "Contiguous" doesn't quite do what I need
Mon Mar 26 15:56:23 EDT 2007
On Mon, 2007-03-26 at 09:34 -0800, Michael Ingrassia wrote:
> Well, if we needed a notion of "contiguous from dimension 1 through
> dimension i" someday, I imagine we could come up with a less error-prone
> syntax. Something like
> dimension a (;, ;, ;, ||| :, :, :, :, :)
> three vertical bars as a visual "barrier"
> (contiguous in first 3 dimensions, all bets off after that).
This doesn't do anything to announce "I know the extents of the first J
dimensions, and here are the initialization expressions that specify
them -- and by the way, they're contiguous."
Van Snyder | What fraction of Americans believe
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov | Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.
More information about the J3