(j3.2006) "Contiguous" doesn't quite do what I need

Van Snyder van.snyder
Fri Mar 23 18:13:38 EDT 2007

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 16:54 -0400, Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hello,
> Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:01 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> >> is 2x2, and I do an operation on (1:3,:) or (1:2,2:2,:), any benefit 
> > -------------------------------------------------->1:2
> May I take it that this clinches the case
> that the proposed syntax is error prone?

No more so than explicit shape, of which it is a generalization.

Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.

More information about the J3 mailing list