(j3.2006) "Contiguous" doesn't quite do what I need

[Van Snyder]

On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 16:54 -0400, Dan Nagle wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Van Snyder wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 13:01 -0700, Van Snyder wrote:
> >> is 2x2, and I do an operation on (1:3,:) or (1:2,2:2,:), any benefit 
> > -------------------------------------------------->1:2
> 
> May I take it that this clinches the case
> that the proposed syntax is error prone?

No more so than explicit shape, of which it is a generalization.

-- 
Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.