(j3.2006) "Contiguous" doesn't quite do what I need
Fri Mar 23 14:47:25 EDT 2007
Van Snyder wrote:
> The notation I propose is just as simple as the contiguous attribute,
> and entirely subsumes it. Instead of "real, contiguous :: A(:,:,:)" one
> writes "real :: A(::1,::1,::1)".
With rank as high as 15, the above is, indeed, complicated,
and, IMHO, extremely error-prone.
Parenthesized lists, where the applications programmer must count,
rather than name, the item to receive the attribute, should be
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
More information about the J3