(j3.2006) question about co-array definition and synchronization
Wed Jun 20 14:11:03 EDT 2007
Consider the program
X = 100
which is intended to conform to 07-007r2 syntax (but may not).
Each image defines its local piece of co-array X, in segments that I believe
are all unordered with respect to each other, i.e. can all be done in
Is this draft-standard-conformable?
If so, how does it not fall afoul of the rule [07-007r2:212:4-5]
>if a co-array is defined on an image in a segment in a segment, it shall
>not be referenced, defined, or become undefined in a segment on another
>image unless the segments are ordered.
Should the words say something like "the part of the co-array that is
defined shall not be referenced, defined or become undefined in a segment on
another image" ? Or are they correct as written?
If the program is not draft-standard-conformable, does that mean that
CAF will not support a distributed programming model where each
image (mostly) handles its own local memory only?
More information about the J3