(j3.2006) J3 Fortran interp letter ballot #13 - due 17-Aug-2007 ** due 6-Aug-2007 if possible **
Thu Jul 26 15:28:26 EDT 2007
On Thursday 26 July 2007 12:07, Jim Xia wrote:
> ?It's appropriate to interpret it as a polymorphic array with the
> same declared type and dynamic type as those appearing in the array
> constructor, respectively.
Do we require that all entities inside the constructor have the same dynamic
type? If we do, then I buy the above statement. If it isn't, then obviously
it won't work.
My impression was that no one ever thought about polymorphic entities
appearing in a constructor and the easiest (not the same as best) choice was
to use the declared type and not worry about matching of dynamic types?
More information about the J3