(j3.2006) Do C_PTR and C_FUNPTR have pointer components

[Van Snyder]

On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 20:34 -0800, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> I think we should say such a thing for types C_PTR and C_FUNPTR. They 
> really do act like they have a pointer component.

We also need to say in the description of the intrinsic modules whether
any of the types they define have type parameters, and whether objects
of the type can be co-indexed (except when that's already prohibited by,
e.g., saying they have pointer or allocatable components).

-- 
Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.