(j3.2006) Question about co-arrays

[Van Snyder]

On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 17:05 -0800, Aleksandar Donev wrote:
> Firstly, as I said before, I am all for saying that C_PTR et al. act
> as if they are derived types with pointer components, and then
> deleting their special casing in favor of using the constraints
> already there for pointer components. But, I did not hear anyone
> actually agreeing with me, so I am assuming this is not attractive.

07-161 will try to do this.  We'll see if subgroup even brings it to
plenary, and then if it even gets a second.  If we don't do this, there
are lots more things to track down than mentioned in UTI 192.  For
example, [230:20-22] an I/O list item can't have a POINTER component
unless the list item is processed by UDDTIO.  What about a C_LOC?

What else have we overlooked?

(Does this need an interp?)

(The itemized list on [230-231] should probably be an enumerated list.)

-- 
Van Snyder                    |  What fraction of Americans believe 
Van.Snyder at jpl.nasa.gov       |  Wrestling is real and NASA is fake?
Any alleged opinions are my own and have not been approved or
disapproved by JPL, CalTech, NASA, the President, or anybody else.