(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3480) WG 5 Request for Additional Corrigendum
Thu Aug 23 11:07:05 EDT 2007
Sally Seitz wrote:
> Hi John
> Thanks for the update. Since neither John Hill or myself could find
> anything in the Directives prohibiting this (and Lisa agrees with our
> interpretation), I think you can go ahead with a corrigendum without a
> resolution from SC 22.
Excellent! We are not ready yet, but should be before the end of the year.
I plan away to raise the matter when I report to SC22, to make sure that
everyone is aware of this ruling.
More information about the J3