(j3.2006) (SC22WG5.3480) WG 5 Request for Additional Corrigendum

[John Reid]

Sally Seitz wrote:
> Hi John
> 
> Thanks for the update.  Since neither John Hill or myself could find 
> anything in the Directives prohibiting this (and Lisa agrees with our 
> interpretation), I think you can go ahead with a corrigendum without a 
> resolution from SC 22. 

Excellent! We are not ready yet, but should be before the end of the year.

I plan away to raise the matter when I report to SC22, to make sure that 
everyone is aware of this ruling.

Thanks,

John.