(j3.2006) Liaison to IFIP WG 2.5
Wed Aug 22 20:11:09 EDT 2007
keith bierman wrote:
> But since IA isn't on the table, I think Dan should gavel the
> discussion moot.
This confuses two issues.
I agree that IA isn't for discussion. I'm happy to gavel it moot.
The issue for discussion is whether Van
should liaise with WG 2.5
Note that Van has authored an article for a book edited
by one of the principles of WG 2.5, and fortran committee
members have authored papers for them.
IMHO, this whole discussion was hijacked towards
rehashing intervals. I think that was unfortunate
as the issue of intervals is long settled.
Purple Sage Computing Solutions, Inc.
More information about the J3