(j3.2006) Liaison to IFIP WG 2.5
Wed Aug 22 16:59:29 EDT 2007
On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Andy Vaught wrote:
> . As far as I can tell, the code ultimately generated would be
> pretty much the same either way, particularly if the compiler is
> with inlining.
*sigh* that is precisely the point; it would NOT be the same at all.
No amount of inlining can get away from the semantic loss.
But since IA isn't on the table, I think Dan should gavel the
Keith H. Bierman khbkhb at gmail.com
<speaking for myself*> Copyright 2007
More information about the J3