(j3.2006) Liaison to IFIP WG 2.5

keith bierman khbkhb
Wed Aug 22 16:59:29 EDT 2007

On Aug 22, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Andy Vaught wrote:

> .  As far as I can tell, the code ultimately generated would be
> pretty much the same either way, particularly if the compiler is  
> clever
> with inlining.

*sigh* that is precisely the point; it would NOT be the same at all.  
No amount of inlining can get away from the semantic loss.

But since IA isn't on the table, I think Dan should gavel the  
discussion moot.

Keith H. Bierman   khbkhb at gmail.com
<speaking for myself*> Copyright 2007

More information about the J3 mailing list