John.Reid at stfc.ac.uk
Thu May 31 12:33:28 EDT 2012
Bill Long wrote:
> On 5/31/12 4:34 AM, John Reid wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Feature 3 of 12-136r2 involves atomic operations. Do we really need to
>> propose more of these as a requirement? If so, I am not the person to
> I guess that depends on the rules associated with the Requirements
> document. If we have a rule that a feature cannot go into the TS unless
> it is included in the requirements, then we certainly need a section on
> the atomic operations. These are quite useful, and it would be helpful
> if vendors standardized on the names of the routines. If a section is
> needed, I can write one.
Yes, please. The final say of which requirements to accept will be with
WG5. It needs to have candidates to consider.
More information about the Coarray-ts